So if you're anxious that you're not technical enough or you're starting too late, the data says your anxiety is pointed at exactly the wrong target. AI won't replace you. The people who know how to use it will. This is everywhere. It's on posters. It's on LinkedIn posts. Nobody can even agree who said this first. And normally, when a line turns into that much of a cliche, it stops meaning anything. So I went and actually checked this out. I did some real research. I read real economists. And what they had to say, I looked at the kind of data you don't actually see attached to a line that's overused like this. And it turns out to be true, but not for the reasons you'd guessed. And it's better news than the quote even promises. So first of all, nobody can even agree on who actually said that AI won't replace you. The people who know how to use AI will. The earliest cleanly dated version that I could cite was from Santiago, who's a computer science and a machine learning engineer. He posted that AI will not replace you, that a person using AI will on X in January of 2023. Andrew Ng, he's a Stanford professor, of course, Google Brain co-founder, has separately said close to the same thing a couple of times. I don't think it really matters who said it first. What matters is whether or not it's true and why. And that's the story of this video. So to kind of put this in perspective, I thought I'd tell a quick story that explains more about AI and jobs than most of these hot takes do that you hear about on the internet. When automatic teller machines showed up on the scene, ATMs as we call them here in the United States, everybody assumed that bank tellers were finished. I mean, this, I was around for that. But instead, teller jobs roughly doubled over the next 40 years because cheaper branches meant banks opened way more branches. You can see this in my neighborhood. There are three or four Chase bank branches and many bank branches of other varieties. In 1985, there were about 60,000 ATMs and 485,000 bank tellers. By the mid-2000s, teller employment had grown to roughly half a million, so that's up. And employment doubled from a quarter of a million to almost half a million over 45 years. So ATMs didn't really have an impact on employment. That's the version that everyone tells. But here's the part that almost nobody includes. Teller jobs have been crashing since around 2010. Not because of ATMs, but because of mobile banking, which didn't just automate a task. It removed the reason to walk into the branch at all. And the Bureau of Labor Statistics is currently predicting a 13% decline in bank tellers by 2035. So that's the real lesson. Automating a task inside your job, you're usually fine. Something that removes the real reason anyone needs you at all, that's the one to watch out for. And here's another real personal example that I don't have great statistics on, but it's an interesting example. My son was a high school baseball player, and we traveled all around Texas going to high school baseball tournaments. And oftentimes we were eating drive-thru food. And one time we pulled up to a Panda Express. He loved that orange chicken, and there's a lot of calories in there, which is great. If you're burning calories, throwing 90-mile-an-hour fastballs every day, you need those calories. And Panda Express delivers in the calorie department. When we rolled up to the drive-thru, we noticed right away that AI was running the drive-thru. It was voice recognition. It was an automated screen. And we were able to give our order to the AI, and there were a lot of great benefits for us from that. And when it did make mistakes, they were easily corrected because the system had been designed so that I could see my order on the screen as I delivered it. So it was a very good user experience. And as a company experience, I imagine it was also pretty cool because the company didn't need to worry about whether or not that 17-year-old kid was going to show up at that drive-thru. Does that mean that there weren't still people working at the Panda Express? Well, no. When we got to the drive-thru, there was a person there. There were people in there cooking the food and so on. So that job wasn't eliminated. It was shifted and changed, but there were still people working at the Panda Express. Were there fewer people, and did that get passed down to the customer as a better price? I'm not sure. Again, it's kind of like the ATM example. Just because I automated the taking of the order, I didn't stop the reason for going to Panda Express. The reason for going to Panda Express was calories needed to throw fastballs, and that still existed. And I really firmly do believe that the kids who were leaning into that and helping the company implement those systems and learning how to run those things and run that business, those are the ones that got promoted to shift leaders, assistant managers, and so forth, because they knew how to use the AI to help the management team run the business. So yeah, this is my opinion, but I also went and checked the actual research on AI and jobs across four completely different fields. Customer support, consulting, writing, and software engineering. Same results every single time. The biggest gains from AI don't go to the people who are already the best at their job. They go to the people who are the furthest behind. In one study, novices improved roughly twice to four times as much as experts did. So if you're anxious that you're not technical enough or you're starting too late, the data says your anxiety is pointed at exactly the wrong target. Now, here's an interesting thing to watch out for as you decide whether or not AI is going to replace you and your job. In a previous video, I talked about how you should treat AI as a really smart intern. In a BCG consulting study, they took two sets of employees. One set of employees had AI available to them, and the other set of employees did not. And the study found that the users with AI did 19 points worse than the people without AI, here's the catch, on a task that was deliberately designed to do things that AI was not good at. The AI-assisted group confidently trusted the wrong output. So this is the same lesson as that video. It's the Ronald Reagan lesson. Trust but verify. The maxim is, dovii, no provii. Trust but verify. As you're working to avoid being replaced by AI and trying to become the person who knows how to use AI, make sure that you're verifying AI so that you're a net benefit to the company and producing more work that's actually valuable. So if you want to become this person that won't get replaced by AI, what are your moves? Here are three concrete, helpful moves that you can make today. Number one, pick one task this week that you would normally avoid or that you normally do badly. Remember, don't pick the thing you're already good at. That's where AI can help you the least and where your payoff is the smallest. Use the intern framework in my previous video. I'll link to it down in the comments. And give AI real context on that specific task and learn how to use it. Become a person who knows how to use AI. And don't wait to become technical enough before you get started. The data says that that instinct is backwards. Novices gain the most from AI, not experts. If you're not sure how to do the thing you want to do, ask AI how to do it. Here's an honest complication, and I think it's really good news. A rigorous study using real government pay data found no measurable wage bump yet for people using AI, and that's two years in to this AI era that we're in now. But at the same time, exactly the same time, employers are already paying 56% to 62% more for people with AI skills in job postings that are out there right now. So the market is already pricing the AI capability stuff in, even before the research has even caught up with this to prove why. That's not a reason to wait. That's the description of a window that's still open for you to start leveling up your AI skills right now, today. Hey, thanks for listening to another episode of The Mark Mason Show. For more content like this, hit subscribe or head on over to markmason.com, hook up with us on social media, or leave feedback. Until next time, ciao.